Scanning every 2026 launch · live, updated weekly

Know which launch is underpriced — before you commit.

You'll buy maybe once this decade. Don't be the one who overpays. Every week I scan all of 2026's launches — plus the units still selling for less than the new launch next door — and hand you the gaps in plain dollars per square foot. The numbers are right below.

This week's biggest price gap
Scanning launches + comparable prices…
16 launches · the full board + the still-selling tracker

How the radar works — and what it isn't

The gap. For each launch we compare its price to a cohort of comparable launches from URA developer-sales data — same district, same tenure, same type (ECs vs ECs only), same era. Price below that comparable level = a gap in your favour. We also flag existing units still selling cheaper than the upcoming launch in the same area.

The estimate. A launch's expected price is derived from the land the developer paid at the GLS tender: breakeven = (land $psf ppr + construction) ÷ efficiency + soft costs, then launch = breakeven × (1 + margin). Real indicative pricing, when released, overrides the model. Launches with no land cost yet show as Tracking.

What it is not. A "price gap" means a project is priced below comparable launches today — a relative entry edge, not a promise of profit or a future resale price. Property carries risk; thin-area cohorts are flagged low-confidence rather than over-stated.